Initially very skeptical about the "advantages" described for the microphone.
When they praise the perfect similarity between the DLX and legendary microphones like U87s and other L12s, it's natural to have doubts.
I must admit it's quite impressive indeed, and the software that allows you to modify the "cardioid pattern," the axis, the filters, the proximity, and even the microphone model(s) and other parameters, after recording, is simply amazing!!!
Purists will still cry scandal over modeling and other "digital stuff," but well, all studios now use digital consoles, effect emulations, and so on.
The practical, efficient, and ultimately affordable aspect of modeling devices is no longer to be proven today.
With the DLX, I recorded vocals, percussion, acoustic guitars, cello, and drum overheads, and frankly, it's incredibly powerful.
It's a budget, that's for sure, but one must have such a tool in their home studio and even in a pro studio.
Without effects or EQ, you can already almost "calibrate" the take in the mix post-recording via the software.
I doubted the microphone's capabilities; I am now completely convinced.
I still recommend thoroughly studying the software to make the most of it.
Having prior knowledge of microphones is not essential but preferable.
And one last thing for those hesitating between the LX, cheaper, and the DLX: take the DLX for its stereo inputs, which is a major asset for drum overheads or acoustic guitars, and so on.
Not being able to record in stereo with the LX can create frustrations over time.
I conclude by saying this microphone is exceptionally effective, and I recommend it to all those who have home studios and even more.
There you go, hoping my humble opinion can help or guide you in your decision to go for this purchase.
Verified
Posted on 02 Feb 2023
By Client